| Author |
Message |
 danielsangeo
|
Post subject: Re: Global warming  Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:57 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 3:59 pm
Reputation: -/+
|
|
Um, I know that. But, didn't you say "And that there is peer-reviewed evidence that it's possible humans are not causing it"? You say that there is peer-reviewed evidence. I want to see it.
__________________
In matters combat tactical and physics theoretical, I am the very model of a modern Major-General.
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Michael Archer
|
Post subject: Re: Global warming Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 5:14 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 12:48 am
Location: So if you care to find me, look to the Western sky.
Reputation: -/+
|
|
I looked back at the posts; I didn't say there was dissenting peer reviewed evidence.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
danielsangeo
|
Post subject: Re: Global warming Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:12 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 3:59 pm
Reputation: -/+
|
|
Then what did you mean by "And that there is peer-reviewed evidence that it's possible humans are not causing it"?
__________________
In matters combat tactical and physics theoretical, I am the very model of a modern Major-General.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Michael Archer
|
Post subject: Re: Global warming Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:19 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 12:48 am
Location: So if you care to find me, look to the Western sky.
Reputation: -/+
|
|
I looked at all my previous posts; unless I'm blind, I don't think I ever said there was "peer-review evidence".
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
ProHypster
|
Post subject: Re: Global warming Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 5:40 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2011 2:21 am
Location: Ground
Reputation: -/+
|
Hi, dropping in to help, Page 4, third to last post, July 4. Quote: That's fine, I can accept that.
Just keep in mind that quantity of evidence is not the same thing as veracity of evidence i.e. just because it's lopsided, doesn't make it true. And that there is peer-reviewed evidence that it's possible humans are not causing it.
Also that climate change denial is not remotely the same as evolution denial. The supporters of the latter rely on the use of arbitrary claims.
Good night. I will continue discussing the implications and whatnot.
__________________
"When a son is born, the father will go up to the newborn baby, sword in hand; throwing it down, he says, "I shall not leave you with any property: You have only what you can provide with this weapon."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
BTGBullseye
|
Post subject: Re: Global warming Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:20 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 7:04 am
Location: 38°16'48.96"N, 104°34'9.42"W - Don't forget to -rep me.
Reputation: -/+
|
ProHypster wrote: Hi, dropping in to help, Page 4, third to last post, July 4. Quote: That's fine, I can accept that.
Just keep in mind that quantity of evidence is not the same thing as veracity of evidence i.e. just because it's lopsided, doesn't make it true. And that there is peer-reviewed evidence that it's possible humans are not causing it.
Also that climate change denial is not remotely the same as evolution denial. The supporters of the latter rely on the use of arbitrary claims.
Good night. I will continue discussing the implications and whatnot. Just looks like a typo of a "." instead of a ",", and a mistakenly capitalized "And".
__________________
I'm not prejudiced, I hate everybody equally.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Michael Archer
|
Post subject: Re: Global warming Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 12:18 am |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 12:48 am
Location: So if you care to find me, look to the Western sky.
Reputation: -/+
|
Alright, so I was mistaken. Here. That's a picture derived from their researches. Click on any photo and it will take you to an entire scientific paper with an abstract and everything. It's about the Medieval Warm Period--a phenomenon that the climate cultists dismiss as a negligible factor. EDIT: BTG, the capitalization was a stylistic choice. It wasn't a mistake.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
