BTGBullseye

Yeah... Just suffice to say, this game looks interesting to me if it has weapons, uninteresting if it doesn't. (and it looks like it has weapons)

Universally New, It Trains You!

PSLLD

Everyone is actually dead, watching some Super Mario Bros videos, because energy pellets.

2380 - Yet another year in time. No celebration happens.

Tomato.

If you know history, then you probably aren't doomed.

Bacon.

If you had a car, but the transmission was fried, would you sell it for less than market price to someone who promised they would shoot it full of holes, and then blow it up with C4?

Unfortunately, no. Those are called PVC Kilts, and we can only wear them.

I can now safely add 'can be killed' to the list of why I almost never play online games.

In fact, the general emphasis on online play these days is one reason why I play a lot of older games.

I've had that for nearly a decade now.

Yeah, I never like horror games that refuse to let you do anything even remotely realistic, like grabbing a weapon. Making the weapons effectively useless is fine, (this makes it similar to actual nightmares) making it impossible to get them in the first place isn't.

It would be interesting to see a horror game that actually delves into the absurd of actual nightmares come to life, instead of these weaponless runfests.

Feeling tired despite an 18 hour nap.

This isn't really for public viewing, but

. Apologies for the out-of-focus.

Quite good. The mics and drums are just a little loud in that recording, (IMO) but otherwise quite good. Sounds similar musically to some of my all-time favorite stuff. I'm not particularly a fan of the lead singer's voice though, just feels like when you hear someone drone on. (though that may just be the recording)

I hope you find someone willing to keep to your current style, there's way too few dealing with new styles nowadays.

But...

I'm still not getting 10... In every meaningful way, it's worse than 7. (excluding DX12, which is currently used by less than 1 game)

I have no idea.

Regarding that video... Whoever portrayed that as being realistic reactions was stupid. Any gamer knows the first thing you do when you see weird is get a weapon, and a flashlight. Once armed, you start looking for better weapons. Anything weird you come across, kill it. This is the gamer way, we are not normal people.

Also, the whispered stuff sounds exactly like in Freeman's Mind. (and I replied to it when it happened in this video, lol)

Just make sure he doesn't do it for Doom/Quake, or any of their sequels. (there are dozens of clones for each)

Mass Effect 3 didn't do that. Its ending was total shit

That is opinion. Some people thought the original ending was perfectly fine.

But Lenny Ate Green Ham...

SCASW

Everyone is acting dead, still some super tentacle goat porn, because fiery shit.

2375 - The title of "Ruler of the Cosmos" is rescinded at my request, the natives being their pilgrimage to earth.

Squeezy.

YAY! You've memorized Goldmember as well. lol

OT: Thruster.

There are still indie game devs that absolutely refuse to incorporate DRM into their games... The second crash would happen only to AAA publishers that like to screw over their audience.

Lemon.

I drive auto or manual... It makes very little difference to me. The type of transmission has less to do with how masculine you are than Pluto's planetary status.

Ok, now I'm into the Pluto argument...

'Dwarf Planet' is and always has been a subcategory of the term 'Planet'. Pluto is a 'Dwarf Planet' and therefore it is a planet. Anyone who says otherwise is a moron. Also, believe it or not, Luna (the moon) is a planet. (as are most moons)

The IAU definition of a 'planet' actually states a completely ambiguous and arbitrary definition of "has "cleared the neighbourhood" around its orbit" as a part of the definition of a planet. The reason this is so controversial, is because there is absolutely NO DEFINITION to this phrase. There are no set ranges, or mathematics used for this. Using this to classify ANYTHING is the same as saying "anything round must be a ball". In addition, they didn't officially consider any planet around any other start to be a planet, until they added to their 'definition' in 2001. (it was a whopping 1 sentence that merely covered the mass of the object)