BTGBullseye

We're happy to assist. OT: Computer fans, and the sound of my keyboard being used.

The worm goes in... The worm goes out... In your stomach and out your mouth...

"Hey!" Straw's cheaper, grass is free. Cows eat it, why don't we?

I like that link. Best we can do at this point is limit automatic firearms to those that are licenced, (in other words, trained in their use) and continue with the basic background checks that are already in place. (they might be able to put in a form of personality disorder test, but it'd probably be thrown out)

Delayed.

No thanks, already got rid of my impacted teeth, and have a natural ability to never get kidney stones. He has a decidedly limited vocabulary. Red light or blue light for seeing at night?

Type this: the part after "v=" goes here

There's a half of a head intruding on the scene!

Add me to that list too! And me. Good classic. I'm gonna have to go for the wubs. NCC-1701-A or NCC-1701-D?

Indescribable.

I'm not just smarter than the average bear, Binky. You're just being paranoid.

Banned for banning me for banning others.

I guarantee I can handle anything thrown my way. (I've had to clean some mighty nasty stuff off second-hand HDDs I've gotten over the years, and I know that a few of them can't be topped)

N0t 1f y0u u53 1337 5p33k!

And therein lies the problem, it's not just intentions, but how you go about acting on the intentions. It's quite obvious that we don't have the words in the English language to accurately depict the difference.

You haven't been reading my posts if you haven't seen me post any sources. I however have gone back and looked at each of yours and found minimal citations, and what you do cite intentionally avoids anything except your side of the argument, even going so far as to omit pieces of information in some. (most of what you post is also media overhyped news on relatively unimportant or irrelevant issues) Funny... I was thinking the same thing about you. I don't stop trying to explain my opinion in a civil and logical manner though. Attempting to insult people for not believing what you tell them to doesn't help. Now that's something I do agree with... I however am not above acknowledging that human nature is to destroy or enslave people who won't fight back. (I am also not above voicing my desire to destroy or imprison the individuals who would and do try to do that)

On the contrary, I have never said anything of the sort. The closest I have ever come to that is my statement that I sometimes have trouble translating complex ideas into understandable writing. You haven't provided any evidence to correlate gun possession by non-criminal civilians to civilian casualties in the USA. There is never any room to sling mud, unless you are intent on violating the forum rules. First off, to which issue are you referring? There are several we have discussed over the last few pages. Second, your evidence is a few incidents with no correlation that I can see to any of the issues we've discussed here. Except that the way you did it is in violation of rule #2 of this forum. (viewtopic.php?p=13&f=18#p13) If it was even halfway funny instead of nothing but a blatant attempt at an insult towards the intelligence of people with an opinion that differs from your own, it wouldn't be an issue. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/racism Read #3 or #2 of the British definition. Racism can be used against anyone, regardless of who's in charge. In many respects it seems logical, if the government didn't have any control over it. We've already seen what happens when Sheriff's offices are in control of Concealed Carry licenses. You get some counties that do it right, and you can get your license in about 3-5 weeks for a very low cost. (in SD it costs $10, takes 1 week to get your temporary, and 3 more weeks for the permanent) You also get some other counties that take 6-24 months to do the same exact background check, and costs hundreds of dollars. (two neighboring counties in CO; one will have a 3-5 week waiting period and a $50 charge, the other will charge $150 and force you to wait a minimum of 9 months) Incidentally, the Concealed Carry background check is identical to the one that firearm sellers manage to complete in under 30 minutes, just so they can sell you a gun. (they don't sell to felons, ever) It's the reason that the 2nd Amendment was put in place the way it is... To prevent a corrupt or tyrannical government from restricting firearms to the general populace. As it stands currently, it has been deemed unconstitutional to require either registration or licensing to own firearms in the USA. (and that will never change unless they manage to remove the 2nd Amendment, which WILL result in civil war)

Some skirts are nice, others not so much... It depends both on the woman wearing it, and on the style of skirt. I dislike any style that restricts the woman's movements. (if she is physically incapable of running in an emergency, that is restricted movement) I'm all about practicality over 'style'.

Balance, and they're video games, they're not supposed to be realistic. Nice random.

So you're thinking something like a personality profile in addition to a background check? You would be surprised at the number of gun stores that won't sell you a gun until you have taken a firearms training course from their shop, or demonstrated your understanding of firearm safety when handling the display models. Also, most new guns come with a secure safety locking system, so proving that you have somewhere safe to store those is moot. This is the lock that is included with Ruger handguns, and how it is intended to be used. The problem with that is that it violates the freedom of an individual. As long as they haven't committed a crime, it is illegal to surveil them in that fashion.

Bees are fun but peas are more edible... I'll go with the one that scares people away when they fly up to you to say "Hi, how are ya?". Snickers Bars or Snickers Ice Cream Bars?

Lethargic.

Makeup is one thing I find both attractive, (when used in very small amounts for enhancing natural features) and hideous. (whenever someone puts too much makeup on) I much prefer it when someone is confident enough to not use makeup at all. (excessive makeup is a common sign of insecurity about physical appearance)

Send me a link, and I can tell you just how it would react to forum rules. (I have experience dealing with image-related rules)