BTGBullseye

Yeah, I got bullied in school too... I was the smallest, youngest, and least likely to back down in my grade... The only reason the bully got away with it was because the principal was afraid the the kid's father (who was the head of the board of director for the district) would fire him if the kid got in trouble. Turns out that when I sent the bully home with cuts and bruises one day, (a new teacher, he let us finish the fight) the father started looking into it, and the principal got fired for NOT reporting on the bullying his kid was doing. (there's a lot more detail to the story, but this is the gist of it)

Cyberbullying is not as big of a problem as physical bullying, but everybody seems to think it's worse than shooting a gun repeatedly at a room full of kids.

San Andreas.

"Ro-gan?"

If you drink Arizona brand Green Tea with Ginseng and Honey, your pee will smell just like Arizona brand Green Tea with Ginseng and Honey.

Tropico 4, though all I got was a black screen... I did get all the DLCs for free though... (apparently a lot of people have gotten this too, it was a recent update)

So you're saying that despite the proven inconsistencies, and scientific evidence PROVING that the radiometric dating method is inaccurate, you don't want to believe, just because you don't like the fact that some are done by religious groups?

You want to argue about sources? How many of your sources have sent in identical items, without a date, told the testing facility multiple different guessed at dates, and NOT gotten back dates that match identically with what they told the testers they expected? How many of your sources have done a truly scientific study of whether or not the testing facilities are giving the tested results, or just the ones that match the dates expected?

Your most recent site only supports the position I've been saying, a very old earth... Not old for anything else, just the earth. If you look at the Hyperphysics link I provided, it even said that there is a proven minimum age for the earth... (in the billions of years) You're arguing a completely different section of this, one that I already told you I believe.

As it is, so far, you have provided nothing that supports radiometric dating outside of specific geological samples. (which is not the same radio dating as I'm talking about)

I know black people... Hey, now I'm racist too! (this is a quote from a black guy I knew)

Does this quote help at all? http://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature07894 Unfortunately, It doesn't say what his 'resolution'

was or when he said it.

I kinda says what a lot of sites are saying, but then never finishing. (same as here) It's nearly impossible to find a site that doesn't flood you with "Evolution is right/wrong" stuff when you're just looking for detailed information about Darwin.

Agreed. Most minorities say they want equality, then complain when they don't get preferential treatment. (something that I call people out on right to their face, it royally pisses them off, but they can't win the argument)

You could always play something like Half-Life...

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v4/n4/assumptions

http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/dating2.html

http://www.asa3.org/ASA/education/origins/carbon-kb.htm

http://creation.com/the-way-it-really-is-little-known-facts-about-radiometric-dating

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/nuclear/clkroc.html (look at the first sentence in the Uranium-Lead section)

Yeah, you have to take into account how much each part posts... I'm only 23% of the insanity, but I post enough to make it look like triple that.

I'm the eclectic psycho.

R.I.P.D. - 8.35/10

Not a bad movie. Quite good comedy at times, semi-boring at others. I do recommend watching it at least once.

At what point did you refute anything?

You don't like the sources, fine... You're intentionally living in ignorance and arrogance, that's your choice.

At what point did I say that the Earth was a young planet? I have no idea how old it is, but I doubt it's less than a few million. I do however believe that there was no death before ~6000 years ago... Go ahead and argue all you want, just don't try to use insults to make yourself feel better.

It isn't humorous, and it's what many call Zero Point energy.

Banned for trying too hard to get here first.

Granted... The good guys now win the same amount as always.

I wish I didn't have a headache right now.

Try an elbow next time if you can.

And yet all you do is attack the site used, not the material it presents and sources. (badly done sources are still sources)

Believe what you want... They have already made batteries that draw about 3mW from nowhere... (they were calling them quantum batteries a couple years ago)

A vehicle that runs is worth at least $500 on craigslist... I got a '96 Taurus for that on there, only major problem with it is the brakes, but people take them to the scrap yard if they don't sell in 48 hours... Take the Jeep, and use it as a stepping stone towards a better vehicle.

Why would we use fusion if quantum is easier, cheaper, produces more power, and is available for use at the same time? (all of which are probable according to a few theoretical physicists I know)

I'm completely out of it... Currently the only liquid in my fridge is milk... Probly won't be getting any more for a while either. (going on a diet so I can get into the Navy)

Trying to decide what to do with my day...

So lets see... You didn't find it a usable source because it is on a site you don't find appealing to look at/read, and because it doesn't use sources from the places you like?

Not to mention, you didn't even read the entire thing... It focused on C-14 as an example, but covers all the different dating methods.