Jump to content

BTGBullseye

Member
  • Posts

    19,552
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BTGBullseye

  1. Yes, their dating methods are a lie. If we knew the atmospheric concentrations, and the original concentrations of the various elements they use for dating, then they could be fairly accurate, but neither of those are known. (not just C-14 dating, this includes all of their current dating methods)

    GIVE THE SOURCES. We can't progress without them.

    I will if I have the time tonight, otherwise it'll probly be tomorrow.

     

    And you're so great, because you only have ONE side of bias driving you.

    Resorting to a personal attack, or are you actually going to refute the argument?

     

    Oh, and that comment you made to @Vapymid about having two sides of bias was TOTALLY not a personal attack.

    Taken out of context, I would agree... (and only when taken out of context) I was saying that there is a bias from each country that are conspiring to induce false assumptions about Catholicism.

  2. You didn't grant the wish then... (your corruption violated a specific part of the wish, the "without any further damage to my body in any way" part)

     

    Granted, you are now dead from old age.

     

    I wish people would read everything that was posted everywhere BEFORE they replied, and that they wouldn't reply to something by taking it out of context.

  3. I can go into several aspects of how current dating methods are so corrupt that they can't get a true date on anything that wasn't observed and recorded when it actually was.

    Which is a blatant lie.

    Yes, their dating methods are a lie. If we knew the atmospheric concentrations, and the original concentrations of the various elements they use for dating, then they could be fairly accurate, but neither of those are known. (not just C-14 dating, this includes all of their current dating methods)

     

    And you're so great, because you only have ONE side of bias driving you.

    Resorting to a personal attack, or are you actually going to refute the argument?

  4. Actually, there are reactors designed specifically to use 232... I can't remember if it enriches it to 233 before burning it, or if it just burns the 232...

     

    As for the unenriched Thorium reactor, it supposedly starts off with straight-up Thorium 232, (with a few other non-radioactive elements) enriches it to U233, then burns the 233, and just goes from there... Pretty neat process if I could ever find the article about it again. (I hate losing stuff on the internet, have to dig through massive piles of shit to hopefully find it again)

  5. That slight amount of waste gets put right back into the reactor... No waste total.

     

    There are two major reasons you've never heard of a Thorium reactor never going critical... 1 - Thorium can never reach a reaction critical enough to cause meltdown. 2 - There aren't any currently operational Thorium reactors yet. (unless someone managed to get one going before it's scheduled start date)

×
×
  • Create New...

This website uses cookies, as do most websites since the 90s. By using this site, you consent to cookies. We have to say this or we get in trouble. Learn more.