Jump to content

BTGBullseye

Member
  • Posts

    19,552
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BTGBullseye

  1. Because that would be the antithesis of the theory of evolution. If you could find two distinct genera merging into one species, that would falsify the theory of evolution. It just doesn't happen like a man doesn't become a wolf under the light of the full moon.

    So you're saying that because it goes against Evolution it can't happen?

     

    It just doesn't happen.

     

    And no, we don't have to prove a negative.

    Yes you do... You made the claim that it cannot happen.

  2. But they can't ever interbreed. Evolution does not happen in "reverse," and species of two distinct genera, even if they evolve to become very similar, cannot merge to become one species.

    What proof do you have of that?

     

    *This is a completely distinct phenomenon than the ability to create "hybrids" using animals of species within the same genus. Which, while it can happen on occasion (usually with substantial human intervention), does not result in the creation of new species, because such hybrids are rare, usually of one sex, and almost always sterile, so a breeding population cannot be created even in a large population of parent animals.

    Where is your proof of this?

     

    **The lines between species and subspecies are actually a lot fuzzier than textbooks written for "laymen" generally state. This actually supports Evolutionary theory, because if "a wizard did it" there would be no such need for fuzzy areas.

    What makes you think that species have to be entirely different in every way to be even the slightest supportive of Creation?

  3. Possibly, but then again I completely trust neither online sources nor the drug approval proccess.

     

    For instance... Did you know that a drug canot get approval from the FDA unless they can determine how much of it will kill you? I learned this while my brother was in pre-med. If someone came up with a drug that you could take in endless amounts, and it would never kill you, it could not be approved.

    Hence why they haven't approved marijuana...

     

    Anyway, Phenergan and Ativan.

    Phenergan: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0000637/

    Ativan: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0000560/

     

    First links on Google for both... Both have harmful side effects.

     

    Marijuana doesn't have any harmful side effects.

  4. did you know that a majority of people with a stuttering problem (i being one of them) can sing without stuttering ever? (dont know how the hell it works if someone can explain it to me that'd be awesome) (seriously though i stutter like every other sentence but i can sing along to songs without any problem whatsoever :))

    Did you know that creative speech is what causes the stuttering, and not the speech itself? (the area that actually causes you to speak either processes faster or slower than the part that decides what to say)

  5. Way ahead of you. (Beaker filled with glowing liquid explodes and blows off my hand.)

    …(Starts laughing like a madman and attaches a chainsaw to the bleeding stump.)

    *slaps Brad upside the head*

     

    "I told you not to mess with my volatile mix! Those chemicals cost more than you'll make in your entire life!"

     

    *takes away chainsaw*

     

    "And quit playing with the lab equipment..."

×
×
  • Create New...

This website uses cookies, as do most websites since the 90s. By using this site, you consent to cookies. We have to say this or we get in trouble. Learn more.