Jump to content

Axeldeath

Member
  • Posts

    4,790
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Axeldeath

  1. Screenshots work just as good. Besides, most laptops aren't exactly high speed GPU-large hard drive computers perfect for replays. No offence.

     

    No insults taken, considering you spelled "offense" wrong :3

     

    But I know her laptop is shit and has a minimum settings graphics card. Her hard drive is small and the processor only gets 2GhZ

    Consideing I had about 30 seconds to make that post and these computers are forced to run internet explorer 8 with no spellcheck, one small mistake isn't bad.

     

    I know that feel bro.

  2. I'll be getting it on friday. Apparently race doesn't matter to stats now, so I'll probably go with a nord. I intend to specialize in magic. Conjuration and illusion and stuff. The cool ones.

     

    Yeah, but there's still the racial special abilities.

     

    ---

     

    I'm going for a Khajit warrior that wields a sword + dirk as his main weapons, he will specialize in light armour to utilize his high agility. I've even written a back story for him :P

  3. There are three separate aspects of sexuality: sexual orientation, sexual identity, and sexual behaviour. These characteristics are not interchangeable, and treating behavior and self-identification as equivalent to orientation is a mistake. Sexual behaviour, being voluntary, is obviously a choice. Gay people having been in prior relationships with opposite-sex partners does not mean that they are actually any less gay, or that they weren't gay before.

     

    Sexual identity does not always correlate with sexual orientation. Gay people may identify as straight earlier in their lives prior to coming out, or later in their lives without ever coming out, but this doesn't mean they're not gay. People who are to some degree bisexual may identify as gay or straight for personal reasons, or because they feel it describes them more accurately. But however they identify, this doesn't alter their sexual orientation.

     

    So we know that identity and behavior are choices, but what about orientation? This is the question that people are fighting over. Calling sexual orientation mutable is simply not correct, yet calling it immutable would also not be correct. But when the only other possibilities are falsely regarding everyone's orientation as mutable when it most commonly is not, or instituting an unprecedented and impractical system of distinguishing between people whose orientation is stable or unstable, the best and most viable option would be to treat sexual orientation as an immutable characteristic in practice. This recognizes the fact that orientation is most often an unchanging feature, and rarely is it under voluntary control. Anything less would be contrary to fact, inconsistent in its treatment of individuals, and would impose an undue burden upon people by requiring that they alter their sexual orientation in order to enjoy the same rights as everyone else. For the purposes of law, the most realistic choice is that being gay is really no choice at all

×
×
  • Create New...

This website uses cookies, as do most websites since the 90s. By using this site, you consent to cookies. We have to say this or we get in trouble. Learn more.