Psychotic Ninja

Xq6je70iqhY

Wait, Jeb's only 16? I never would guessed. I thought she was in her mid-late 20s. Never bothered to check her profile until now though. Oh gosh. Thank you! I'm taking that as a compliment. Some people have mistaken me to be 16-17.

Technically I could adopt, but a male 23 year old adopting a female 16 year old might raise some eyebrows...

Basketball

*taps quote*

All fandoms suck.

So, people are complaining about Buttercup's raspy voice in the PPG reboot, and that she's a "tomboy who can't be ladylike". What? Did they forget that in the original she had a raspy voice and was a "tomboy who can't be ladylike"?!?

YUKmq7UMJys

And again, ignoring my explicit statement of exactly where I have a problem so you can strawman my position. Allow me to try one last time. If you still don't get it, you're either a liar or you're illiterate and whoever is reading this to you is a liar. MY PROBLEM IS NOT THE INNACURACY ITSELF. MY PROBLEM IS PEOPLE ACTUALLY, LEGITIMATELY, WHOLE-HEARTEDLY BELIEVE IT AND MAKE CONSEQUENTIAL DECISIONS BASED ON THAT MISINFORMATION. PEOPLE DIE BECAUSE OF THIS KIND OF STUFF. Is that clear enough for you? Do I need to fit it into a six-second soundbyte? "My problem is that people believe it." Is that better, then? Work with me here, I am at a loss on how to make this any more clear to you. Looks like someone ignored what I had typed... Do you have actual proof of this? Is there actual legitimate proof that people actually believe things like gamma radiation turning you into a giant green hulking monster when you get angry, because they saw it in a movie? Or that they can climb walls just from being bitten from a spider? Do you have proof of people testing these things because they saw it in a movie? Not setting off firecrackers because they're dumb teenagers who got a hold of firecrackers.

Seattleite, they're movies, they're fiction. Not bloody real life! People watch movies to be entertained. They're not going to stop and think "is that explosion realistic?" No, they're going to enjoy the movie. Me enjoying The Avengers, even though it's not 100% accurate, is nothing like hanging out with someone, having a blast, and then all of a sudden they punch me. You're acting like it's on a personal level, when it's not. Your issue isn't with movies/shows. That's your scapegoat.

I wouldn't go that far. I would. These studios still peddle that "10% of the brain" myth, too. That is an outright lie, how does it not inspire anger in the people watching when it so brazenly insults their intelligence? Because it's a fun "what if"? Because people actually enjoy the movie? Why do you always assume the worse? If you're going to bitch about something as minor as people vaporizing (when they shouldn't) and "people believing it to be true" then why not bitch about gamma radiation turning someone into a giant green hulking monster, every time they get angry? I'm sure there are kids out there who believe that to be true. These movies are fiction, they're not real, why can't they have fun with how they handle explosions, vaporization, or whatever? They weren't made to edjumacate people.

Final Fantasy 9

It does have cookies after all.

I wouldn't go that far.

I'll just sneak in here as well. Seeing as I've been interested in streaming myself. However, I'm more of the silent type of gamer (even though I have no mic to speak into in the first place), and no means to do face cam. Not sure if I want to do face cam in the first place (or is that the "law" with streaming nowadays? Like how you "need" 1080p and 60fps for video game footage on Youtube). In other words, if I were to stream, I would like help in the internet department, and the possibility in mic/voice and face interaction. Oh and setting up as well. Bonus points if you're willing to be test auidence(s). Do note, I would only be able to stream at night (on my end) so... yeah.

(yes, I'm using an image as my word, if you don't get what the word I'm implying is, click the spoiler)

Some people are mostly salt. But in all seriousness, have you never heard of suspension of disbelief? Not everything's going to be 100% accurate in movies, and they shouldn't be. My vent: People are complaining about the UI in the PC version of FF9. They're complaining that Square took the lazy route, and just use the same one that's in the mobile version. Is there any UI in any game that's universally praised? Just be glad they did something! Be glad they actually ported the damn game! 7 and 8 were ported before, but never 9. This is the first time it's been ported over to PC! Everyone says that 'X fanbase is the worse'. The Final Fantasy fanbase is the worse. Never satisfied with anything. Hell, no matter what they were going to do with the FF7 remake (even if it was updating the graphics, giving you full camera control, and making it fully voice acted), people would have complained. We even got gameplay footage of the remake, and people bitched about that, saying it's going to be linear as fuck. We only got the starting area. Wanna know something about the starting area in the original? It was linear as fuck. Don't get me started on the whole "it's going to be episodic, so Square's just going to make each one $60 so that they can get as much money as possible" bullshit.

Eh, babaloo?

bFhUOi0srtE

Sometimes I want to punch the internet for not working.

Ruf ypuid hu! oui lnywo Dutch pycdynt.