Alyxx Thorne

Nice avatar. If you know what I mean.

Empathetic

I'm still invested in a game if it's something I enjoy. Like Fallout 4, loved the story and was pretty invested in it.

Yeah both Bethesda and 2K had comments that were 99% identical. That tells me they have a NDA with Nintendo.

That makes me happy.

I sometimes refer to tits as "girls" so...

Never heard that in my life. Must be a European thing.

Believe it or not but I got it from Japanese anime...

It was supposed to get Ubisoft titles, and they tried at the start with Deus Ex: Human Revolution and Rayman Legends, but then bailed like EA.

Deus Ex HR wasn't a UbiSoft title... It was published by Square Enix...

Personally the lack of support from third parties is the reason I never got the WiiU. And so far I haven't seen a single game on it that made me want to get one. And since the Switch seems to have better support right off the bat I'm more tempted to just skip it and get a Switch.

According to this article here http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2016-10-20-nintendo-switch-officially-revealed Bethesda hasn't officially confirmed Skyrim Remastered for the Nintendo Switch. This smells a bit of false advertising since Skyrim footage was featured in the Nintendo Switch's first look video.

 

Update 2: While Bethesda's much beloved Skyrim was clearly shown during Nintendo's Switch reveal video, the publisher told us today that it's not officially confirming the game just yet. "We're happy to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Nintendo on the video. While we are not confirming any specific titles at this time, we are pleased to announce our partnership with Nintendo and support of the Switch. We look forward to revealing specific games and details in the future," a spokesperson said. Skyrim Remastered is set to launch on October 28 for Xbox One, PS4 and PC; perhaps the Switch will receive a version of the Remastered game at launch?

It's not necessarily false advertising yet. Bethesda at least shows interest in the console so I remain hopeful.

In theory I think it looks awesome. I love the concept of being able to have the same experience on the go, given the battery life is decent. It all depends on what games are gonna be on it though for me. I'm not at all interested in Zelda or Mario, but a decent first person shooter might get me sold on it.

dying genre, don't count on it

if they release a new metroid i'll buy it

If I can play Fallout 4 or Skyrim on it I'm sold.

Very compassionate

Intense

"Hmmmm... what to wear..."

Waking up, getting ready for work and making breakfast.

I'm a tad worried that you have a boy in your pants

XD Bahaha, oh my gosh.

Zaraki, it's called a "manhood".

My bad then! Sorry if I wasn't clear...

I sometimes refer to tits as "girls" so...

2aw53pKAN10

In theory I think it looks awesome. I love the concept of being able to have the same experience on the go, given the battery life is decent. It all depends on what games are gonna be on it though for me. I'm not at all interested in Zelda or Mario, but a decent first person shooter might get me sold on it.

For me it depends on my mood but I love to play pretty much everything regardless if it's old or new. As long as it's a good game and fun to play, it doesn't matter. I love everything from Commander Keen to Call of Duty: Black Ops 3.

Much like Heliocentral I'm not that big on Atari games or really early PC games, they get a bit too simple for my taste. I do like a lot of NES games though and I've played quite a share of Commodore 64 games.

I do not agree with the last sentence, though, as it makes a difference in some games and makes things look unnecessarily dated (because VR games, for instance, require 90 FPS minimum to prevent nausea).

So far I haven't heard of a single VR or VR exclusive game with a 30 FPS lock and VR is kind of a niche thing anyway for people with extremely powerful rigs that can handle such high framerates anyway. And yes, I know you can get cheaper VR experiences but comparing it to something like the latest Occulus Rift or HTC Vive is like comparing spaghetti to pizza.

So I kinda don't get the point other than that it would be stupid for a dev to implement a 30 FPS lock in a VR game which I agree with and it's probably why nobody has done it yet (surprising given 30 FPS lock is a recent trend).

Ubisoft tried doing with "30 FPS is more cinematic" to defend FPS locking on PC to conform with "current-gen console experience" of Watch_Dogs.

I struggle to get even 20 FPS in that game sometimes. I would be happy if it ran at 30 FPS, lol

I've played games that were downright unplayable on launch, but then the problem was stuttering and framerate drops, not a locked 30 FPS framerate. I think there is a huge difference and crying "doom" just because there is a 30 fps lock on a game is taking it a step too far in my opinion.

Working on my game, making a new area.

My point was that bitching about a 30 FPS lock to the degree people are is unnecessary. It's a minor inconvenience at best, but people are talking about it like it's the downfall of gaming...

Bitching about people bitching about a 30 FPS lock isn't productive. Other people have said exact the same thing so all you're doing is adding to a circlejerk. Well thought and rational conversations don't come from a two sided "I'm right, you're wrong" debate.

Well sorry that my opinion is the same as someone else's... I never said you are wrong, just that I think people are exaggarating, and that's just how I feel because it's not something that bothers me...

"Playing Typing of the Dead with style!"

Making breakfast and regretting going to bed far too late last night.

Divinity: Original Sin

My pyromancer witch is getting pretty terrifying.

FPS is important to me to some degree. In games like CoD I always lower settings to make the game run faster just to get a higher framerate, but I've experienced that stuttering is a far bigger problem to me than 30 fps. I can work with 30 fps, I can't work with stuttering or moments when the framerate suddenly dips into single digits and then back to 60.

My point was that bitching about a 30 FPS lock to the degree people are is unnecessary. It's a minor inconvenience at best, but people are talking about it like it's the downfall of gaming...

I was just speaking my opinion... and my opinion is that unless a game is stuttering/fluctuating, then it's not that big of a deal, not enough reason to warrant not buying a game.

Whenever someone complains about 30 FPS I think people sound like spoiled whiny brats (no offense to spoiled whiny brats).

I grew up with games that usually would play at 10-20 FPS on a good day. Heck, Star Fox on SNES which I played to death growing up would usually run at like 5 FPS on some levels. And most of the time as long as the framerate is stable I don't care if it's 30 FPS. I would rather have a steady 30 FPS than a fluctuating 10-60.

Locking a game to 30 fps is a way of ensuring it runs smoothly, so I have never grasped why it's necessarily a bad thing, let alone reason to boycott a game.

I kinda get it, and kinda don't, as someone who doesn't give two f***s about framerate most of the time and has learned to appreciate anything that runs higher than a slideshow.