Jump to content

MakoVlazkov

Member
  • Content Count

    64
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Congrats to S.S., don't forget to join the UN so you can sap money and military protection from the UK and US!
  2. How is it changing the punishment at all? How is it going to change anything except to increase the spread of what is illegal to things that shouldn't ever be illegal? As it is, it is up to companies to prosecute these illegal acts, those that perform them, this bill will make it a federal offense, and it will be up to federal authorities to prosecute... wait... you know what, I'm suddenly against this bill, this is just another expanse of federal power over our lives.
  3. Reading comprehension? Never heard of it? Too bad. If you had bothered to read the full post or even look at the bill objectively, you'd see that endangering video game content is not the intention of this bill, but is due to its wording, the bill in and of itself is a good idea, but it needs to be more precise in wording, for it is intended to apply to illegal streaming of copyrighted content like movies and TV shows, not video games, and so I proposed revising the bill, but you didn't read that, you only read up to those 5 words and instantly decided to make a judgement call. All of that is already illegal, so why do we need another bill that says that illegal things are illegal, especially when it's way too broad? It isn't saying that, it is increasing punishment and the deliverance of punishment for these illegal acts, because the current system is not working.
  4. -rep for those 5 words. Reading comprehension? Never heard of it? Too bad. If you had bothered to read the full post or even look at the bill objectively, you'd see that endangering video game content is not the intention of this bill, but is due to its wording, the bill in and of itself is a good idea, but it needs to be more precise in wording, for it is intended to apply to illegal streaming of copyrighted content like movies and TV shows, not video games, and so I proposed revising the bill, but you didn't read that, you only read up to those 5 words and instantly decided to make a judgement call.
  5. In the words of Jeff Foxworthy, "We can't keep the most ignorant amongst us OFF the television." I don't seriously want to believe that people take TV as an accurate account for the majority of a people. If it is so... world, I am disappoint.
  6. I wish I knew exactly what we did to the world that makes people so happy to embrace negative stereotypes.
  7. It probably wont pass, it is a good idea, but the wording is too broad, they need to revise it. Why are so many people bashing the US?
  8. Well isn't it obvious? I honestly am not sure, I really am not sure whether or not he is joking, and that is what worries me.
  9. Demons summoned by cultist scientists? Please, please, please let this be a joke.
  10. How about I cut your balls off and sell them to a Vortigaunt?
  11. I didn't mind until Episode 36, merely because he tries to recounts what happens, what would happen if the experiment succeeded or failed, and it caught me odd that he didn't even joke or quip at how one of the men on the team was so paranoid about a Resonance Cascade, which it is inferred that Freeman knows what it is.
  12. I wonder if Freeman really does know what a Resonance Cascade is, like the scientist inferred he did at the start of the game.
  13. And how is that a good thing? Is that really funny? Is there no form of intelligent or sensible humor? Is there no form of humor that isn't shallow or degenerative?
  14. Heh, i tried to tell people that Machinima isn't "evil doom murderdeathkill corporation M" , and my rep instantly went down by 3. I guess i just rub people the wrong way?
×
×
  • Create New...

This website uses cookies, as do most websites since the 90s. By using this site, you consent to cookies. We have to say this or we get in trouble. Learn more.