Jump to content

Dr. Derpy Hooves Ph.D

Member
  • Posts

    3,786
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dr. Derpy Hooves Ph.D

  1. "Who are you, to lay down who is, and who is not a Christian?" or "May not many a man who cannot believe these doctrines be far more truly a Christian, far closer to the spirit of Christ, than some who do?" Now this objection is in one sense very right, very charitable, very spiritual, very sensitive. It has every amiable quality except that of being useful. We simply cannot, without disaster, use language as these objectors want us to use it. I will try to make this clear by the history of another, and very much less important, word.

    The word gentleman originally meant something recognisable; one who had a coat of arms and some landed property. When you called someone "a gentleman" you were not paying him a compliment, but merely stating a fact. If you said he was not "a gentleman" you were not insulting him, but giving information. There was no contradiction in saying that John was a liar and a gentleman; any more than there now is in saying that James is a fool and a Doctor. But then there came people who said -so rightly, charitably, spiritually, sensitively, so anything but usefully-"Ah, but surely the important thing about a gentleman is not the coat of arms and the land, but the behaviour? Surely he is the true gentleman who behaves as a gentleman should? Surely in that sense Edward is far more truly a gentleman than John?"

    They meant well.

    To be honourable and courteous and brave is of course a far better thing than to have a coat of arms. But it is not the same thing. Worse still, it is not a thing everyone will agree about. To call a man "a gentleman" in this new, 'refined sense', becomes, in fact, not a way of giving information about him, but a way of praising him: to deny that he is "a gentleman" becomes simply a way of insulting him. When a word ceases to be a term of description and becomes merely a term of praise, it no longer tells you facts about the object: it only tells you about the speaker's attitude to that object. (A "nice" meal only means a meal the speaker likes.)

    A gentleman, once it has been spiritualised and refined out of its old coarse, objective sense, means hardly more than a man whom the speaker likes. As a result, gentleman is now a useless word. We had lots of terms of approval already, so it was not needed for that use; on the other hand if anyone (say, in a historical work) wants to use it in its old sense, he cannot do so without explanations. It has been spoiled for that purpose.

    Now if once we allow people to start spiritualising and refining, or as they might say "deepening," the sense of the word Christian, it too will speedily become a useless word.

     

    C.S. Lewis on the subject of words. (Regarding which, he was a very intelligent person)

    TL;DR

  2. Not this again...

     

    To state my opinion again: I'll post whatever I damn well please as long as it has a reasonable relevance to the topic.

     

    Where are threads being "infected" with ponies and going off topic? I'm sick of people saying this and not giving any examples. Any threads that did get derailed were derailed by non-bronies crying about pony response images. Even before I never got how there was any "pony spam", why are images suddenly spam if there's ponies in them?

    BROHOOF.png

  3. He's like the internet personified!

    That very though passed through my mind as well. XD

     

    I gotta say, as bizarre as that world is, I wouldn't mind a day in it. Though I could do without those creepy fucking bunny strider things.

     

    They're not bunnystriders until they have penis cannons

  4. Well that was an awesome episode. XD

     

    "let us never speak of this again."

     

    The streaming for me was HORRIBLE

     

    It kept freezing every 30 seconds, I missed the entire ending because my browser stopped responding...

     

    Though I'm pretty sure Celestia didn't say anything, just the mane 6 walking down a red carpet, am I correct?

     

     

    I started to panic trying to find streaming sites when I barely noticed it was 8, so I missed some of the beginning as well.

  5. Ahhh, Cartridges...

    I used to previously own these

     

    Namcomuseum 64

    Super Mario 64

    Paper Mario

    Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

    Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask

    Tetris

    PotC 1 and 2

    Frogger

    Super Mario Bros.

    etc...

     

    And I currently own these:

    Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Mobilized

    Linerider

    Sims 2 pets

    Legend of Zelda

    Super Metroid

    Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (Master System edition... >:|)

  6. I lifted 15 tons of boxes today (well over 300 boxes, each 40 lbs). Some of the other warehouse guys were kind of surprised at how capable I was even though I've only been working at this new warehouse for a week.

    I got 'runner's high' on that somehow I guess. It's also very delightful I've been blessed with the physical health of being able to do that even though I don't work-out and haven't exercised any need for that kind of arm strength for a very long time.

     

    Most of my strength lies within my legs, I love to run.

     

    As for my lungs, I still have yet to figure out what's wrong with 'em.

    I'll run for a few miles an pass out, My #1 assumption here is that I have a low lung capacity, I've been trying to find out ways to increase it.

  7. There's a difference between ADD and ADHD?

    ADD is Attention Deficit Disorder, which means you have a short attention span.

    ADHD is Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder, people tend to think that people like this are always hopping off the walls...

     

    I also have Asperger syndrome, which means my brain works differently from others...

    People with Asperger syndrome tend to do things absentmindedly, and repetitively... And also lack social skills.

  8. Bad attention spans + hyperactivity = A very off topic forum.

     

    This is on topic.

    This thread has no actual topic, it has a topic that we set for it.

     

    Back on topic. We were discussing ADD and ADHD.

×
×
  • Create New...

This website uses cookies, as do most websites since the 90s. By using this site, you consent to cookies. We have to say this or we get in trouble. Learn more.