Selous Templar

7Ak8fX4Foew

WAR

THIEF: The Dark Project

LIFT

10/10, One of the best songs off one of the best JP albums

Ah, a Man of good taste.

also an 9/10 it's pretty great. Nice melody and good vocals, not sacrificed on the altar of aggression.

AQTY_9EBgIU

Rubber

METAL

Sounds just like me, except I'm not called Harry.

I think you'll fit right in mate!

Okay, sure, let's say I'm biased. I'm biased because I am citing specific quote unquote "evidence" proving my points? Or am I biased because perhaps I don't fall into similar political views? You know people are allowed to have different opinions right? It's just a matter of whether people choose to take it seriously or not, based on evidence, or lack thereof. I just have chosen to be highly skeptical of what you cite as evidence, based off of what I have accrued as quote unquote "evidence" which is statistically backed, and is not a rant made by Raz0rfist, The key is a variety of sources which can be backed by actual scientific proof.

There's nothing scientific about Politics mate. Don't know where you're pulling that from.

I wouldn't dismiss everything you say as biased if you had a reliable source of information that isn't FOX, CNN, or a tabloid's article, or aforementioned man in a "basement" trying to be "edgy" that I don't even know anything about and am judging a book by it's cover on

I wouldn't use Mainsteam Leftist biased """news""" sources like Huffington Post, ABC, CBS, MSMBC, Associated Press, New York Times, LA Times, Washington (com)Post, CPAC, Daily Beast, and The Blaze as sources.

And I don't use CNN, they can take a drive off the cliff for all I care.

I do understand it's free speech for nazis, or free speech for nobody,

Wait for it, about to contradict yourself...

but it's America and people can legally take action against hate speech.

And there we go, a typical post-modernist left wing argument: "hate speech"

Here's two revelations for you cultural marxist sloganite:

1) Hate Speech IS Free Speech, by definition. Free Speech exists to protect speech that is unpopular or "hateful" because popular speech doesn't NEED protection. Hate Speech =/= Insighting Violence. That's what you don't understand. Hate Speech has never existed before the 21st century, and there are already laws in place against inciting violence. Which helps lead into point number

2) THERE ARE NO Hate Speech laws in the United States. So using violence to curtail the ramblings of an ideology smaller than the audience of the Oscars under the false pretense of "fighting hate speech" is more fascistic than anything Benito could come up with. Also funny how there is hate speech laws in Europe, which don't have first amendments and no free speech. Makes you think who is truly free and not just by some statistic chart.

When governments or legal bodies crack down on what people can or cannot say, that's a restriction on free speech. And before you say "ACLU IS EVIL AND IT'S A LEGAL BODY THEREFORE IT'S A RESTRICTION ON FREE SPEECH", no, it's just a group of lawyers that assists with people whose civil rights are infringed upon, who much of the time happen to be minorities.

Well even though I was thinking about that Left wing hate group the SPLC,

Yeah that's what those snake oil salesmen want you to believe. They are lobbyists, they have a stake in what the government does, that means they are mandating government censorship. And if they truly cared about "minority rights" then they should protect the "white supremacists" and alt-right you so vermontly hate, because they are not mainstream opinions and are technically minorities.

That, and it is usually only obeyed federally when the Supreme Court makes a decision on something.

Yeah, because the supreme court are surely the arbiters of nonpartisanship right? It's not like they've made terrible decisions in the past that would never have been supported by the founders nor by anyone alive today with their brains still in their heads right?

Dredd Scott VS Stanford or Roe Vs Wade ring a bell? Or maybe Obergeffel Vs Hodges basically flipping off states rights?

There has never been an institution more unaccountable to the american voter nor to the government than your judiciary. Like that famous quote:

"There will be no justice in this country until you can swing a judge from a tree" - annonymus

Also, what are you saying in that last sentence? They aren't fascists. I've said that multiple times.

That doesn't make it true numbnut. And everything I've seen them do indicates that they are the ENBODYMENT of fascism.

Antifa is "ANTI-FASCIST". Clue's in the name.

Ok, so do you believe that the National Socialists are Socialists?

Do you think the Democratic Republic of Congo is a Democratic Republic?

Is The People's Republic of North Korea a Republic of the People?

Your logic of "if they say so it's true" is total horseshit this way, because their actions speak louder than their words, and their actions against ordinary innocent americans indicates that they are the Italian Blackshirts reborn.

Very few people in Antifa are nationalists and even fewer, maybe even none can be considered fascists.

Nationalism isn't a bad thing you realise? It's the love of your country. Nationalism =/= fascism and if you think so you do not understand fascism OR nationalism you left wing hack.

I'm not surprised that many people in Antifa aren't nationalists because Antifa Hate America and everything America stands for like the anarcho-Communist scum they are.

Please cite some evidence showing they are fascists if you're going to claim that.

1930's Italian Blackshirts:

http://reason.com/archives/2017/08/22/choose-sides-you-bet-but-antifa-and-fasc

https://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2017/08/economist-explains-11

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/09/the-rise-of-the-violent-left/534192/

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40930831

https://www.revealnews.org/blog/reveal-host-al-letson-shields-man-from-beating-at-anti-hate-rally/

What lovely pro american people they are

American patriots

Spreading anti-racist messages

Totally not domestic terrorists

If they are proud of their message, why cover their faces?

All Antifa signs they carry.

Carrying Communist flags is the equivalent of carrying Swastikas, if not worse, and is more offensive.

"Hooded thugs that cover their face and promote and commit violence and intimidation to advance their beliefs"

Who does that remind you of?

Meanwhile, just look at all these far-right fascists:

Also: At least Antifa doesn't have the history of holocausts and racism in the background of it, unlike Neo-Nazis and Neo-Fascists, and, to a far lesser extent of holocaust on the Alt-Right.

They are Fucking Communists, they have killed MILLIONS more people. Have you heard of Gulag Archipelagos? They were also extremely racist towards outsiders like the Hungarians and the Polish, not that you care about all the innocent lives that communism and socialism has killed.

http://reason.com/blog/2013/03/13/communism-killed-94m-in-20th-century

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes

But you ARE a biased filter. Why the hell should I listen to someone so Alt-Left that's just going to dismiss everything I say as biased?

Or call good people as "edgy basement dwellers"

Here's what you have to understand:

FREE SPEECH FOR NAZIS, OR FREE SPEECH FOR NOBODY.

If the other side can't have their say before fascism shuts them down, then the side you claim to be the more moral, are the REAL bad guys.

THIEF: The Dark Project

Boots

THIEF: The Dark Project

Khaki

Sniper

Well why don't you just join ANTIFa then?

If you're so supportive of Alt-Left Fascism, why don't you go ahead and join them?

It's not like the FBI and CIA have labeled them as domestic terrorists right?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/antifa-domestic-terrorists-us-security-agencies-homeland-security-fbi-a7927881.html

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/01/antifa-charlottesville-violence-fbi-242235

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4844296/Homeland-Security-deem-antifa-domestic-terrorists.html

White Supremacists may be violent and cause deaths, but to deny that the Alt-Left isn't the one instigating and starting the violence to begin with is very biased and nieve.

Betruger

7/10 Decent enough remix

v0DvT9MxdoE

James Bond.

On Her Majesty's Secret Service

(of) Evil

Irrisistable