Deep Dive Devin

Or anyone else who hasn't compromised their literal eyes and ears, evidently. That is what it is. It's not an opinion that you get to just call untrue, it is objectively repeating the lie the state tells, which anyone can debunk by looking at the original footage. I have to wonder if you spend a lot of your time writing things like "rape" and "genocide" and "slurs" in these sarcasm quotes on a regular basis too.

How many worms are in your brain right now?

It's insane to me that the people who won't watch the footage where he very distinctly does not do the thing you're pretending he does are the same ones accusing me of not watching your shitty propaganda video.

Given that your go-to responses amount to "watch this youtube grifter who does my thinking for me", I doubt you'll be talking about it anywhere else either. Who would even want to seriously entertain that?

"Deny your eyes and ears and force yourself to agree with these OTHER pro-murder child rape defenders or else you're heckin insane libard!!!!!!!" You are state propagandists.

By your logic, Charlie Kirk was killed in self-defense too. I mean, he wasn't, obviously, but you seem to think he was given that he wanted the left dead and so do you (and if the shooter had been an actual leftist, you'd have been right). His pro-murder rhetoric is what gets people killed, same as yours. I'm firmly in the "murder is bad" camp, which you are consistently proving yourself ideologically opposed to. Imagine how many people would still be alive if we saved them from the pro-murder right before now. Is it not weird to you that you've signaled support for murder seven times in this thread now? It's only a problem to you when the person is as pro-murder as you are? It's crazy how much you seem to adore Charlie Kirk being murdered in the universe where he's less racist than you.

It is extremely likely that accursed farms forum user BTGBullseye is making a post falsely equating the bogus crime statistics he believes in with more-accurate reports from less-biased sources as a deflection from the fact that he is constantly signaling support for a consistently more criminally-violent political affiliation

I'm gonna become the guy who watches all eight Star Trek shows just to make Media Literacy™ jabs at republicans. This is true praxis, along with getting epic twitter dunks on Elon Musk

"The child rapist clown government has 'determined' that shitting is a religious group, citing the assassination of John F Kennedy as proof of this very-real group's intentions"

It's more than just that though. You can expect this from conservatives (Chuckie's killer was almost certainly a Nick Fuentes fan after all), but it's also exceptionalism. The idea that a cishet white American conservative man did it is, like the majority of political shootings, something they desperately need to distract and scapegoat from. And an unfortunate convenience liberals and conservatives share right now is the belief that the US "did everything it could" to stop the mass murder of Palestinian civilians (conservatives will say this AND that the killing is justified, somehow). Somehow they say, Israel's government is just too powerful, we can't do anything to them. Trump and Biden are repeatedly described as "putty in Netanyahu's hands" by the media. But like. No they're not. The US could demilitarize Israel in a day if we wanted. But why would we want that? We're America! Mass murder and settler colonialism is our whole damn thing! The Israeli government isn't controlling our white supremacist project, they're our favorite tool in it. So the US can just sit back and play the innocent card, and keep equating ethnic cleansing with jewish personhood, and invent a secret cabal that can kill whichever citizens they want, no matter how useful someone like Chuckie is to the agenda. Which is the most antisemitic thing in this entire debate, really. You'd think it wouldn't work that way, but it's not always as simple as you expect. Honestly, I don't think CIA is correct, but his take is the most lucid if we're going the conspiracy route -- it is awfully convenient that this happens to the rare far-right dude who actually is asking for the Epstein files (not that this exonerates him, of course), right after what seems to be Trump's drawing of a naked child's body and poem about raping kids leaks to the media. I don't think the Trump administration made this happen, but they sure got everything they could have wanted from it.

Really not wasting any time connecting the dots between two different justifications for collective punishment there, are ya

So are we getting a change to the thread title since it's apparently just BTG's thread for propaganda posting now?

You're calling me a liar because I'm acting in good faith. Your quote of "bad faith" here is me, literally making the argument you should have used for you! It's clear from your own hypocrisy that you view honesty and conformity as the same thing. I wear your hate as a badge of honor.

The context for conservatives celebrating the murder of people they don't like is that they are celebrating the murder of people they don't like. I don't know why you think I can't see what they're saying, I posted what they're saying and there's no moment in any of these instances where any of them say "just kidding, I actually don't believe any of what I just said". And not being sad that Chuckie died isn't that, despite what you've implied up till now. That sure hasn't been the opinion of every conservative I've seen in my life up until this point, aren't you the ones who have been banging the "cancel culture" drum for the last decade? Please say to me, verbatim, "everyone who ever fired a conservative for their reactionary politics was justified". You just answered it. Calls for violence are not protected speech. Not only are you defending institutions and yes, the government, censoring people for non-violent speech about Chuckie (including literally just quoting him in a way that makes him look bad), you are pretending that Chuckie was not constantly, constantly advocating for violence himself. If the left is violent for not being mad about groyper gang violence, then Chuckie is certainly more violent on every possible level for constantly fueling violent conservatism and literally making direct threats in several cases. I haven't justified anything, you're hallucinating again. The only person who can reliably be stated to have justified the gun violence that killed Chuckie Smallface is Chuckie himself. He was quite literally spreading false statistics about trans people to influence violence against them in the moment before he died. "Citation needed, but anyway here's some shit I made up with no citation, because I'm innately better and don't need one" And of course there are no "cremation furnaces" being built. That's not what the Nazis did to kill immigrants either. You somehow made an argument so bad here that I'd have to correct you by saying "the death camps aren't literally using zyklon B" if you wanted to make the correct version of your insanely bad argument. The context is that conservatives believe and say all of this. You really haven't, though. You've put links that you SAY justify anything, but then they don't actually do that. And unlike me, you've never even made an attempt to explain anything. You just say "this proves it" and then think rhetoric isn't actually important for you. Your entire philosophy here seems to be "I get to tell you what to do, you don't get to tell me what to do".