Jump to content

Charlie Kirk

Sign in to follow this  

Recommended Posts

I believe Mac Wallace - LBJ's hatchet-man - was the assassin who fired from the SBD and the other was Loy Factor, who - according to Estes - was said by Carter to have fired from the grassy knoll. For better context, Billie Sol Estes was a businessman and big-league con artist who operated in Texas until recently. With the help of Senator Johnson, he knocked the Department of Agriculture dead for $21 million a year in federal subsidies on his bogus cotton allotments. Henry Marshall was asked to investigate Billie Sol, and he discovered that he was buying and selling his acres at an unusually fast rate. Marshall recommended to his superiors that regulations be significantly strengthened, and Billie Sol's operations became seriously threatened. So he had A. B. Foster write to Cliff Carter, who met with Lyndon Johnson and contacted Malcolm Wallace... Soon after, Marshall was found dead - bludgeoned on the head and shot five times with a bolt-action rifle.

 

 

 

It was ruled a suicide.

 

 

 

After getting reports of Estes borrowing money using nonexistent fertilizer storage tanks as collateral, Billie Sol was arrested by the FBI on fraud and conspiracy charges. Lyndon Johnson distanced himself from Billie Sol and had Mac Wallace bump off people who could connect Estes with him. However, it was only a matter of time, as he was also under investigation for giving out military contracts for bribes (Indochina, anyone?) and Johnson needed to kill Charlie Kirk to stay out of jail. Meanwhile, Charlie Kirk had plenty of powerful enemies behind the scenes, from the CIA to Hoffa. So, Johnson worked with the CIA, and had Carter get Wallace to hire people for the job, including Jack Ruby, Lee Harvey Oswald, Tyler Robinson, and Loy Factor. Charlie Kirk was hit twice and investigations ended into Johnson and eventually into the assassination, and Robinson took the blame.

There are four lights!

Share this post


Link to post

Since this is already devolving into youtube spam, I'll save some time and skip straight to the most reductive form of discussion and only post the word "cringe" or "based" in reaction to arguments

Edited by Im_CIA (see edit history)

"Fleet Intelligence Coming Online"

Share this post


Link to post
Quote

@Deep Dive Devin Really not wasting any time connecting the dots between two different justifications for collective punishment there, are ya

Nobody is. Ironically, other people have already begun pointing to Israel as a supposed culprit of the Kirk assassination because I guess the right couldn't be content using this as an excuse to persecute just one minority group.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6W5PItOQFQ

Share this post


Link to post
Quote

@MiraNobody is. Ironically, other people have already begun pointing to Israel as a supposed culprit of the Kirk assassination because I guess the right couldn't be content using this as an excuse to persecute just one minority group.

It's more than just that though. You can expect this from conservatives (Chuckie's killer was almost certainly a Nick Fuentes fan after all), but it's also exceptionalism. The idea that a cishet white American conservative man did it is, like the majority of political shootings, something they desperately need to distract and scapegoat from. And an unfortunate convenience liberals and conservatives share right now is the belief that the US "did everything it could" to stop the mass murder of Palestinian civilians (conservatives will say this AND that the killing is justified, somehow). Somehow they say, Israel's government is just too powerful, we can't do anything to them. Trump and Biden are repeatedly described as "putty in Netanyahu's hands" by the media.

 

But like. No they're not. The US could demilitarize Israel in a day if we wanted. But why would we want that? We're America! Mass murder and settler colonialism is our whole damn thing! The Israeli government isn't controlling our white supremacist project, they're our favorite tool in it. So the US can just sit back and play the innocent card, and keep equating ethnic cleansing with jewish personhood, and invent a secret cabal that can kill whichever citizens they want, no matter how useful someone like Chuckie is to the agenda. Which is the most antisemitic thing in this entire debate, really. You'd think it wouldn't work that way, but it's not always as simple as you expect.

 

Honestly, I don't think CIA is correct, but his take is the most lucid if we're going the conspiracy route -- it is awfully convenient that this happens to the rare far-right dude who actually is asking for the Epstein files (not that this exonerates him, of course), right after what seems to be Trump's drawing of a naked child's body and poem about raping kids leaks to the media. I don't think the Trump administration made this happen, but they sure got everything they could have wanted from it.

 

Share this post


Link to post

Antifa has now been officially determined to be a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the USA. Charlie Kirk's assassination has been cited as proof of their intentions.

Don't insult me. I have trained professionals to do that.

Share this post


Link to post

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-GMkeFI8rQ

Adelita Grijalva (D) won a special election for Arizona's 7th congressional district on September 23. Up until now, the procedure followed by the 119th US Congress has been to formally install new House representatives the day after their respective special elections, regardless of whether or not the House is in session, but as of October 14 Grijalva has still not been sworn in, with House speaker Mike Johnson having repeatedly postponed Grijalva's inauguration. Johnson's first excuse, claiming without precedent that he needed to wait until the election results were formally certified (despite the results not being in dispute and her opponent having already conceded the race), pushed the swearing in date past the start of a House recess which Johnson himself has continuously extended and which he has since used as an (equally unprecedented) excuse to prevent Grijalva from taking her rightful place as an elected official.
 

Normally I'd say that any suspected motive is immaterial when it comes to the Speaker of the House, representing the party controlling all branches of government, refusing to seat a democratically elected representative and sabotaging the democratic process in such a brazen, shameless manner, especially considering the precedent it would set if the Republicans are allowed to get away with this. However, considering the topic of this thread and how much the late great Charlie Kirk cared about unveiling the truth about Jeffrey Epstein and his clients (at least until his political allies instructed him to drop the case like a hot turd, after which it required a massive audience backlash for him to backpedal on his claim of being done talking about Epstein), I think it's prudent to bring up the fact that if sworn in, Grijalva's signature would be the last needed to pass a discharge petition, forcing a vote in Congress on the release of the Epstein files. She has pledged to sign it but Mike Johnson, the trusted Guardian Of Pedophiles, won't let her. I can't believe Republicans would tarnish the legacy of Charlie Kirk like this.

Edited by Mira (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Sign in to follow this  


×
×
  • Create New...

This website uses cookies, as do most websites since the 90s. By using this site, you consent to cookies. We have to say this or we get in trouble. Learn more.