BTGBullseye

Bullet penetration. I hate it when you shoot a cardboard box, and it somehow stops an armor piercing .50 high power rifle round that was fired from 3 feet away. I very much appreciate games that not only allow a bullet to penetrate, but also deflect the bullet, and reduce its damage on the other side appropriately, based on the material of what was penetrated. (this system exists in HL2, but you have to use a mod to fully enable it)

Star Trek Online.

In addition, it is blatantly obvious that they weren't really finished building the game, but they had so much hype going for it that they couldn't afford to miss releasing on the deadline.

Just Cause 3. Just beat the game. Not too bad.

Just Cause 3. Jetpack wingsuit with missile launcher and machine gun... Nah, this isn't OP at all...

It may have been relatively complete when they showed it, but in implementing the other systems necessary for the game to function as a game instead of a demo, it may have broken something in that content that couldn't be easily fixed... Hence, cut content. We don't know, so don't be hostile until we find out for sure.

How do you know that that content would even be in a format usable by the current engine? It isn't always cut just to remove it from the game, there can be technical issues with the content. As I said, we haven't given the devs sufficient time to find out if they're going to let the game rot, or finish it.

Just Cause 3. Impressive visuals, and it's just as impressive that it can run on my system with SSAO and Global Illumination, and average over 12 FPS. (after a few tweaks, and dropping resolution to 720p)

What I take from what I've seen of it compared to the promise, is that they were unable to meet their deadline because they stupidly set it too soon. Because of this, they released a late Alpha, or early Beta instead of the final product. Unfortunately, most devs would take the money they made on this, and move on... It remains to be seen if the devs are actually going to finish the game, or leave it to rot.

Stuffed frogs are cool... My Mom says so.

Pineapple. It's neither pine, nor apple...

Dutch?

Honestly, I feel like Bioshock would do better as an open-world than it would linear, despite the linear story. (you can have both, and do it well)

Devs that aren't dicks, but are still actively communicating with the community.

You have to bear in mind that I'm using a laptop, so it has shared memory between the system and GPU... The equivalent of 6GB system RAM, and 2GB GPU RAM. (the first is about 1GB less than needed, the second just barely enough) 16GB for a system isn't overkill, nor is is even close to overkill for a game that literally has a 50km x 50km open world map with no travel load screens, and full rendering at ~0.75km distance. (and fairly high res minimum texture settings) It's not poorly optimized, I'm just running it way below specs, and surprisingly getting 10-15FPS out of it. (going by their official minimum settings, I shouldn't be getting more than 4FPS) I'd personally say it's incredibly well optimized, but they didn't think to include an option to disable the grass/shrubs.

It'd be a good idea to include a link next time. http://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/77868/? It's an 8.3GB 'mod' for Skyrim.

I have all three on Steam, with all DLCs. I also own the first Bioshock on physical media. (and played it back when I only had a DX9 GPU, and was 'amazed' when I finally got to see the DX10 effects) Don't jump to conclusions.

It's pretty close to perfectly balanced, (apart from some of the combat) which results in that a LOT. Here's the main reasons why most people think there's such a difference: 1. The later games are 1st person shooters instead of turn based strategy. 2. They can't directly control their companions in the later games. 3. They wanted another isometric TBS, and they refuse to accept that it isn't that anymore. 4. The later games aren't viewed through the lens of nostalgia, for obvious reasons. 5. The setting is the same, the gameplay mechanics are what they're referring to when they talk about the 'feel' of the game. I personally fully agree with you, there is no significant difference in the feel of the environments, despite the different gameplay style. ________________________________________________________________________ OT: Just Cause 3 @ about 10-15 FPS. (it has incredibly high RAM requirements, and it is a requirement not a suggestion, and I only have 8GB instead of 16GB)

If you want to try out a non-toxic group, you could try Battlefield 2142... You have to install the game normally with all patches, then patch it with a custom patch that tells it to link to the custom private server, (there are no official servers anymore) then you can play on their server. This is literally the ONLY way to play this game. http://dethklokclan.enjin.com/

Now I'm interested... lol Bioshock is one of those games that really needs the remastering, if only to give it better compatibility with modern systems.

Yes, but if what I'm reading about Lightworks is right, your CPU is going to be your bottleneck if you have a decent GPU already. A single large SSD will probly do you nicely if you decide on using Lightworks.

You don't like teamwork? My guess is you rarely have someone on your team that can keep up with you, and that has soured your experiences.

Yeah, I recall one panel interview about Fallout 4 after its release, (don't ask which, I don't care enough to remember) and they said Obsidian still had full rights to make another Fallout title, and that the F4 devs were looking forward to seeing what Obsidian came up with.

Just Cause 3 + all DLCs. (they were on sale for $45 total) I'm not sure, but I think this may be the largest single game I own... (46.1 GB for a 25km x 25km equivalent open world map)

I like that for a FO:NO theme. It definitely fits the Fallout feel. I personally would like to see a Fallout that gets this for an abbreviation: FO:SHO