Ross Scott

I'm still busy with a lot of stuff, but a new interview has gone up if you're interested. This one is for the "Max and Teddy in the Morning at Night - Sometimes" show that broadcasts on a college radio station out of Cleveland. This interview almost didn't happen, since they had a technical problem and didn't confirm they could hear me before broadcasting live, so the first 10 minutes of this is them trying to troubleshoot their equipment while I listened helplessly. The first half of this are questions I've gotten a lot in other interviews, the bottom half has ones I haven't gotten before. Link to show page Direct link to mp3 of the interview Try to find the spot in the interview where their supervisor walked in and started talking to them also while broadcasting live!

The legal issue has more or less resolved. I got the rights back to my videos and thus no longer have to press legal action against Machinima for numerous contract violations they committed. I might go into more details on this later, for now I'm just glad to not have to deal with them anymore.

I may have to research it more to see how it affects previous predictions I've read, but the article you link is predicting 11 million barrels production a day by 2020. The USA currently consumes about 19 million barrels a day right now. I find it kind of weird that we would export when we're still consuming more than we're producing, but it could lower foreign dependence. Based on our record so far, I really don't have much in substantial energy savings until we're past a tipping point, I see consumption globally just rising until then. Once it falls due to demand outstripping supply, and KEEPS falling (this happened once already , that's when I think you'll see global shockwaves. The thing is for new discoveries like this in the USA, there are more old oil fields going dry and shutting down. Our rate of new oil discovery peaked back in the 60s. Shale oil will buy us time for sure, but I'm not sure how much it really affects the timeline for peak oil itself.

Regarding the 2.5 and 1.5 million number, I did a search on google for "civilians guns defended criminals per year" and this was the second article that came up: http://fair.org/extra-online-articles/the-self-defense-self-delusion/ The short version is they're saying the numbers don't really add up to the claims. Also there is this quote: "the FBI’s Crime in the United States report for 1998 found that for every instance that a civilian used a handgun to kill in self-defense, 50 people lost their lives in handgun homicides." That's coming from the FBI, so I would need to see some analysis showing that figure is wildly misleading. Granted, a substantial portion of those homicides are probably from existing criminals, of which a certain portion will get guns anyway, but the rest would be from accidental deaths or heat-of-the-moment homicides. 50:1 is a big number to drop to 1:1 or less. Again, I'm not arguing against shotguns or most rifles; I think those combined with non-lethal self-defense measures would get you a long way towards the criminal deterrent argument.

1. Last Legs 2. Triage At Dawn 3. Valve Theme (Extended) 4. Hard Technology Rock 5. Nuclear Mission Jam

Not necessarily, I found this fact sheet also: http://smartgunlaws.org/gun-deaths-and-injuries-statistics/ Problem is more data is needed. Here are some of the problems noted: -Your source says about 1,500 criminals are killed by civilians with guns (they didn't cite what kind of guns, and which crimes either.) -The source I found says in 2010, guns were used for about 11,000 homicides, but it doesn't say which kinds of guns, nor whether the homicides were committed by legally registered ones (as opposed to people who were already criminals). -The source I found also cited that homicide rates are much higher in areas with higher levels of gun ownership, but it isn't stated as to how much. I need apples-to-apples data comparisons to really change my mind on this, as opposed to "here's a bucket of apples"

I don't have a deadset view on gun control, but my general thoughts on it are to have a balance between what is practical v. what will lower accidental deaths. I don't really a problem with shotguns or up to semi-automatic rifles. Those are obvious, deliberate weapons with a purpose. Besides law enforcement or special case permit scenarios, I'm not so sure what the advantage is to keeping handguns legal. I think handguns probably increase accidental deaths substantially, plus I think they make impulse shooting easier. I've had times where a driver has thrown a beer bottle at me while I'm on a bicycle that I would have liked a handgun, but probably would regret it later. Does anyone have stats for what kinds of legally registered guns are most used in accidental or heat-of-the-moment shootings? My guess is the majority would be handguns. Moreover, I also think that the number accidental deaths from handguns probably far outweigh the number of scenarios where someone is saved against an assailant by a non law-enforcement individual who happens to have a handgun on them. Unless someone has stats to disprove me, I think you can make the argument that less innocent people will die with handguns being banned than with them not (assuming criminals have access to them either way). For automatic weapons, I'm not really sure of what the practicality is. You can make the "overthrow corrupt government" argument, but if the military or police want you dead, your automatic weapon isn't going to save you. Besides, somebody tell me what the practical application of a TEC-9 is besides shooting up old cars or else murdering somebody in a drive-by? Also before people read into this too much, I don't have a strong opinion on the topic, mainly because I think America has way, WAY bigger problems than gun control.

I'm less familiar with that situation, but I think you're looking at my prediction the wrong way. Peak oil is a certainty. We're talking about steady depletion of a finite resource at a rate that's going to catch up to his sooner or later, I say sooner. A nuclear conflict in the middle east would of course hasten all kinds of things, but I find that something that's very difficult to predict. It would of course move the timetable far up, but I see that as less of a sure thing. Even my 2015-2016 prediction could be wrong, this is just based off the best data I've been able to fine. I would be amazed if we make it out of this decade without some sort of peak oil crisis hitting however.

That link doesn't work for me, but I can say this: With shale oil, that might extend our timetable some, but I think these predictions are bogus. Even if with have 1,000 years of oil under the USA, we're not EXTRACTING it fast enough to keep up with consumption. This won't prevent peak oil, it would just make the falling slope a little less drastic.

I kind of consider the USA as whole now to be insane with its priorities. I think neither major political party represents the interest of the people at large anymore and a lot of people are just brainwashed or distracted by topics that are ultimately trivial in the long run as to the course the nation / globe is going to take. I don't see it collapsing without some sort of catalyst. I think if we continue the way we're going, the USA will follow a path similar to Argentina; a massively corrupt government with economics that will essentially eliminate the middle class. In my opinion what COULD cause some sort of collapse in the short term would be finally getting past peak oil (I'm predicting 2015-2016 for that), or some eventual economic implosion from having a debt-based economy. I personally don't see the South seceding prior to something like that. While the tension is real, I see that more as misdirected aggression towards larger problems where a scapegoat is needed. Plus, I feel I have to link to this article regarding their track record on that: http://www.theonion.com/articles/south-postpones-rising-again-for-yet-another-year,377/ On the flipside, I see Obama as sort of a puppet politician, like many others, who may be well meaning, but doesn't strike me as especially serious about trying to reform some of our most extreme problems.

I probably would get a little more, but the amount of people doing it intentionally based on a request from me probably wouldn't be significant enough to make it worthwhile. While a certain percentage of people having ads play does help me, I don't wish ads on anyone and wish there was a way around it. Besides, I'm all about sustainability, and me begging people to watch ads isn't really a sustainable situation. Really I just need to make more videos and hopefully give people reason enough to keep watching them.

Hey, Well now that I'm releasing stuff independently from Machinima, the situation has changed some. Since I don't have to go through Machinima anymore, one of my plans was to make a BIG push on subtitles this month. User "danielsangeo" on the forums is pretty much in charge of this. I'd like to respectfully ask that you don't keep putting the videos up on Youtube, because I really could use the views since I'm essentially "rebooting" from leaving Machinima. If you don't mind, please send me or Daniel the subtitles instead. You can put yourself in the subtitle credits, then your subtitles can become the official Czech ones on the videos. I have been horrendously behind on subtitle in the past, but now that I'm getting help, I really think I'm going to make a ton of progress on it. Again, by the end of this month, I'm expecting English subtitles on almost all the videos, and as many foreign language ones as Daniel can process (he won't change the text, but he may have to doublecheck the timing as the new videos no longer contain the Machinima logos). I really do want to support subtitles for as many languages as possible and for once, I think I finally have the means to do it.

There are a TON of graphic adventure games, many coming out every year. Mainstream gaming media almost never covers them now unless they're cross platform, like Walking Dead. Most graphic adventure games don't have tons of money to throw around, thus they don't get the same (or any) coverage in a lot of places. Blame game journalism being on the take, not the genre. Here's a good source on new ones that come out: http://www.adventuregamers.com/ Check the new releases and you see there's about half a dozen coming out every month.

I might try and change the embedding to blip.tv later, by the time I thought about it, I was about 60% done with the links and din't want to have to mess with it again.

This is just a quick announcement that I've uploaded all my old videos to my own personal Youtube and Blip.tv channel and all the site links have been updated to point to them. I'd like to request people use these links in the future as opposed to the old ones at Machinima.com's Youtube channel. I could go into detail on this, but I've been legally advised not to say more than that for now. They're all streaming versions the highest quality copies of the videos I have available. The download links have also all been updated (except for Stranger In Need and FM48, those are coming later). I've updated hundreds of links, so if you spot any errors, please let me know. Link to Blip.tv Channel Link to Youtube Channel Apparently Youtube spammed a bunch of subscribers when I put the videos back up, my apologies about that; I would have turned that function off if I knew how to. It's a one-time thing though, you shouldn't get spammed with new video links in the future unless there are actually new videos. More news coming this month!

Blip.tv link (download will be up later) Welcome to what I think is the second-longest episode of Freeman's Mind! My apologies about the delay on this one, all I can say is I'm about as busy as Freeman is in the video, the difference is I'm not getting shot at. This one got rushed a little bit as I promised to have this one out this week, but I'm still pretty happy with how it came out. It does make me NEVER want to promise when something will go up AGAIN. I keep meaning to never say that, then forget. So from this point on I'll just say I'm unlikely to give any hard dates when something will come out for anything. I prefer a "when it's done" approach anyway. That doesn't mean Duke-Nukem-Forever-Style-Wait-15-years-Then-Go-Bankrupt "when it's done" however. On that note, I'm giving no promises when the next Freeman's Mind episode will come out, despite my original intention of doing it every 2 weeks. I intend to submit the Freeman's Mind DOTA 2 voice pack to Valve first, and finish up one other project before resuming. To try and make up for the delay, I am going to attempt to respond to (almost) ALL emails in my inbox. I currently have 632 emails I haven't responded to, many of them months old. I hate not having time to reply to people, so I want to catch up on that. Starting this weekend, I will begin to reply to at least 20 emails a day until I am caught up. More news coming soon!

Unfortunately not, this one is just taking too long (I think it will be the second longest episode so far), but we're only talking about a delay of a day or two. I plan to make a new post tomorrow on some other stuff. EDIT: Actually I won't. The new post is related to legal stuff, which I thought was going to be partially settled tomorrow, but it looks like not. What I can promise is Freeman's Mind this week, and probably an additional post this week also.

I've already made those, though I didn't make alternates for them (yet). They're done in my best Unreal Tournament announcer style voice for that. I've been trying for months man.

Short of getting hit by a meteor, yes. Really I was aiming for Monday, but I think things are tight enough now that Tuesday might be more realistic. It will be ASAP no matter what.

There's a new interview up from Lewis Schofield who runs his own internet radio show and contacted me about having an interview a few weeks back. You can listen to it here: Link to interview page I think I might have come across more awkward with my answers in this interview than some of the others, my brain tends to bottleneck my thoughts on some topics where I'm not sure where to begin. He may have edited some of that down though, I'm not sure. Regardless there's some material in this interview not covered in previous ones and a mention of one of the projects I've been involved with. I'll have more information on that at a later date. Also I did remember later the other OTHER project I'm working on that I couldn't remember during the interview, that's also coming later. In other news, I still plan to have Freeman's Mind out sometime next week, though I can't promise which day yet.