BTGBullseye

2189 - The time travelers from 2188 realize that their time travel is the exact same as the kind of time travel everyone else always does all the time.

'twas Nagisa actually, but I digress. 'twas both... You weren't in on the PMs we all got.

Your avatar's tail glitches. It ain't just the tail. It's missing almost 3 frames, and pausing instead.

Guardians of the Galaxy 9.2/10 They better make a sequel... With pizza...

I can provide the firearms... Who gets the .22 long-barrel bolt action, and who gets the 20-gauge single shot? I'm keeping my own .40 semi-auto pistol in case it's a draw.

Preparing to eat. (just finished showering after changing a tire on my Dad's car)

Not bad...

Well, I have yet to finish the campaign since I had to spend a little while fixing my computer, but once I finish it, I'll be up for MP matches.

Excellent episode! Waiting for the final ep so I can force my family to watch all of it.

Can be explained as each side viewing the other as equals (in a sense), and wanting to have a good time over continuing a horrible war, if even for a moment. That has nothing to do with honor, and everything to do with soldiers scared of their superiors and retribution. How? Because CS soldiers wouldn't respect their superior's decisions, is that what you're getting at? Emphasizing my point that you are incapable of understanding what honor is. Who ever said that? I most certainly didn't.

So my anonymous sources aren't worth anything, but if you see one that goes to a media outlet, you'll trust it? Or if some person claiming to be a scientist makes a paper, then everything in said paper must be true? That you're not just arguing to be an asshole. Ok, so you're saying that there's no possible way to avoid collateral damage, or possibly war crimes? That's a bit naive of you. Again, you're assuming that the US invasion force would be spraying bullets all over the place, and not caring about civilian casualties. Do you truly believe there is no possibility that collateral damage could be avoided? There was more context, but I won't get into it... She essentially was asking for the USA to turn Cuba into a US territory. Because you seem to think that there is no reason to be an anonymous source, or that an anonymous source can possibly be a reliable source.

Freeman's Mid A web series focussing on the mid-section of Freeman... It even cuts off any treble or bass audio so as to be as moderate as possible.

http://www.hrw.org/world-report/2013/country-chapters/cuba

2185 - Life, as we know it, ends.

Welcome, and don't try to start the war all over again. (the casualties were great, and we don't want to see that level of bloodshed again)

I'm not positive, but I might have something like that in my library... I'll give a listen for it when I have the time.

Getting ready to take a shower, and finally not having to worry about the computer crashing. (Windows somehow managed to reset the restore point storage from 10% to 50% of the drive's space for the C: drive, and it decided to make sure there was only 8GB left on the drive, so it kept crashing because of that; I reset it down to 8% drive space)

Faceplant.

Merry 3rd day of Christmas!

The problem is, that he doesn't believe that honor even exists. He thinks it's just some gimmick, and there is no value to it. Without honor, there wouldn't have been a pause over Christmas during WWI, where German and English soldiers shared a meal and a football game... Without honor, soldiers would kill their superior officers for a quick promotion... Without honor, the Civil War would have been far bloodier... I can go into more detail if required, but it shouldn't be necessary if you look back into history with even the slightest ability to understand what honor is.

Why? It's not like you're going to do anything except violently disagree, and then use veiled insults and requests for sources that I can't give you. (and you don't think that anonymous sources are worth anything) And I need one besides yours. Until you provide one, you're definitely not going to get one from me. Where is your conclusive evidence that it would require excessive killing, or that it wouldn't be worth it? Again, where are you getting your conclusions from about the general populace's attitude towards the stated actions? This comes directly from an anonymous source in the country, who is communicating with me at the risk of her freedom, and quite possibly her life: "Almost half the country would take up arms against the government if they actually had weapons available to them. You should get the USA to help us out." http://www.hrw.org/world-report/2013/country-chapters/cuba

The episode wasn't long enough!!! I want more!!! Especially sticky keys rants.